For the first few pages of Williams I had no idea what he was trying to prove about literature. I didn’t understand what he meant by “abstract” and “concept” at all. His piece was very abstract if you ask me and didnt get to the real point until the end in which I was wondering what the point then was.
Michaels page:
I definately understand what your saying… It is kinda hard to understand them but you got more than I did. I was totally confused by him throwing in there his Marxist theory. Seriously I thought that he was just breaking down what literature actually was and how it influenced society in general. He made it seem as though because of the pedistal that we have put creative writing up on it is constantly combating our more practical uses of literature. Is history, or the sciences even considered literature any longer… or just essays? hmmmm
Raymond William 1/29
January 29, 2007 by hanaa
Keva Roberts page:
For the first few pages of Williams I had no idea what he was trying to prove about literature. I didn’t understand what he meant by “abstract” and “concept” at all. His piece was very abstract if you ask me and didnt get to the real point until the end in which I was wondering what the point then was.
Michaels page:
I definately understand what your saying… It is kinda hard to understand them but you got more than I did. I was totally confused by him throwing in there his Marxist theory. Seriously I thought that he was just breaking down what literature actually was and how it influenced society in general. He made it seem as though because of the pedistal that we have put creative writing up on it is constantly combating our more practical uses of literature. Is history, or the sciences even considered literature any longer… or just essays? hmmmm
Posted in comments | No Comments Yet
Comments RSS